SCIENCETALK.ORG
  • Conferences
    • SCIENCE TALK '23
    • SCIENCE TALK '22 >
      • Event Page '22
      • Agenda '22
      • Sponsors '22
      • Speakers '22
      • Logistics '22
    • SCIENCE TALK '21 >
      • Event Page '21
      • Agenda '21
      • Sponsors '21
      • Speakers '21
      • FAQ '21
    • SCIENCE TALK '20 >
      • Event Page '20
      • Agenda '20
      • Speakers '20
      • FAQ '20
      • Posters/Artwork '20
    • SCIENCE TALK '19 >
      • Schedule (2019)
      • Presentations (2019)
      • Panels (2019)
      • Workshops (2019)
      • Photos (2019)
    • SCIENCE TALK '18 >
      • Schedule (2018)
      • Keynotes (2018)
      • Photos (2018)
    • SCIENCE TALK '17 >
      • Schedule (2017)
      • Speakers (2017)
      • Photos (2017)
      • Videos (2017)
  • Community
    • Forum
    • "A Science Blog" >
      • Pitching Guide
      • Blog Contributor Style Guide
    • Volunteer Openings
    • Ethics Policy
  • Collaborate
    • Partnership Opportunities
    • Sponsors and Partners
    • Advisory Panel
  • Resources
    • Communication Resources
    • Training & Courses
    • Meet the Community
  • About
    • Membership
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Executive Board
    • Volunteers
    • Contact
Picture

This section will not be visible in live published website. Below are your current settings (click inside this section to edit the settings):


Current Number Of Columns are = 3

Expand Posts Area = 1

Gap/Space Between Posts = 10px

Blog Post Style = card

Use of custom card colors instead of default colors =

Blog Post Card Background Color = current color

Blog Post Card Shadow Color = current color

Blog Post Card Border Color = current color

Publish the website and visit your blog page to see the results

Audience, Empathy, and Messenger: My Takeaways from SciTalk ’22

5/11/2022

0 Comments

 
By Scott Hershberger
​At Science Talk 2022, hundreds of science communicators from around the world shared their expertise and made new connections. In my previous post, I wrote about my experience meeting fellow science communicators in person for the first time. Today, I’m going to share my personal takeaways from the workshops and talks at the conference. Out of the many good ideas bouncing around at the sessions, I noticed three themes that came up again and again: know your audience, be empathetic, and choose your messenger wisely.

Know Your Audience

When acquaintances ask me to define “science communication,” I generally say something about “bridging the gap between scientists and the public.” The truth is, there is no such monolith as “the” public. Are you communicating with white evangelical Christians in Texas? Science-interested college-educated liberals in California? Middle-class Muslim women in Pakistan? All these audiences hold differing values, live in different cultural contexts, and have potentially different levels of background knowledge in the topic you hope to address.
​

In their virtual talk “Helping Scientists Maximize Impact with SciComm,” Sheeva Azma and Nidhi Parekh gave an excellent example of culturally relevant scicomm. The “bread exam” video by the Lebanese Breast Cancer Foundation shows a traditional Lebanese baker kneading and pressing dough, demonstrating to fellow Lebanese women how to examine their breasts for lumps. The video leverages the audience’s familiarity with breadmaking while avoiding any mention of taboo concepts.

​Delivering the opening keynote, Sheril Kirshenbaum highlighted potential disconnects between what we might consider common knowledge and what our audience actually knows. For instance, in 2018,
49% of US consumers agreed with the statement “all food with deoxyribonucleic acid should be labeled.” If your audience does not realize that all food contains DNA, you’ll need to establish that background before launching into a discussion of GMOs, CRISPR, or organic food.


Betsi Oliver, who presented a short talk on her work building community partnerships in Alaska, urged us to reframe the goals of our science communication projects. Instead of asking ourselves “What product do I want to make?”, she said, we should ask ourselves “What outcome do I want to achieve?” First and foremost, that means meeting our audiences where they are.

​Be Empathetic

As social science research on cognitive biases has shown, facts alone are typically insufficient to cause people to change their attitudes or behaviors. Instead of shouting from the rooftops that COVID vaccines are safe and effective, we need to take the time to understand the nuanced and often justified reasons why someone might be reluctant to get vaccinated—then validate their feelings and find values in common.

Jennifer Ma gave an excellent talk on “Compassionate Science Communication in Practice,” which she summarized here in a pair of blog posts. Using the case study of her Instagram project “Gentle Facts,” she walked us through a four-step process for engaging with vaccine-hesitant audiences: listen, relate, inform, encourage.
​

The importance of empathy also came up in a SciTalk ’22 workshop on “Communicating with Science Averse Audiences.” The workshop, led by three PhD candidates at the University of Washington, gave attendees the opportunity to role-play stressful conversations we might have as science communicators. First, we addressed a heckler disrupting a presentation. Then, we practiced one-on-one conversations with individuals who disagreed with us. In the latter situation, the first step was to ask open-ended, nonthreatening, non-leading questions. Second, we had to accurately restate the other person’s viewpoint and try to find common ground. Only after accomplishing these two steps could we share our own perspective with our interlocutor.
Picture
Workshop participants role-play tense science communication conversations. Credit: Camille Collett
As an aspiring climate communicator, I found the workshop incredibly relevant and helpful. The role-playing exercises gave me a framework for approaching difficult scicomm scenarios with empathy, a skill that I hope to continue developing in the coming years. Plus, “be empathetic” is not just good scicomm advice—it’s good advice for all of life.

​Choose Your Messenger Wisely

You may be an expert in your science, an expert communicator, or both—but that doesn’t necessarily make you the right person to deliver the message, especially on a potentially controversial topic.

At SciTalk ’22, I attended a workshop called “‘We’re the government and we’re here to help:’ Disaster recovery communications.” Three Oregon government officials talked about their experience communicating with residents in the aftermath of the state’s devastating fires in fall 2020. Unsurprisingly, many of the communities they wanted to reach were distrustful of government figures—especially when officials said that beloved trees on many people’s properties were now hazardous and needed to be removed.

The speakers explained how they first worked to build trust with community leaders. Then those community leaders carried the message to other Oregonians. In the workshop, we broke into groups to practice honing a message and identifying the messenger who could most effectively reach our target audience.
Picture
During the disaster recovery workshop, my group comes up with a communications plan for the aftermath of Godzilla’s rampage across Oregon. Credit: Camille Collett
The importance of the messenger was also featured in the panel discussion “Communicating Science in Español: Reaching a Global Latinx Spanish Audience.” The speakers pointed out that literal translations of scicomm content are much less likely to resonate with their audience than translations that incorporate appropriate cultural references. That means that the translator should understand the relevant culture—even better if they are a member of the community.
​

It can be difficult to admit that we, despite our expertise, are not always the best messengers. But if we scicommers think of ourselves as network builders, as Betsi Oliver does, we can take heart that forming community partnerships will facilitate a much deeper impact than working alone would.

Putting the Pieces Together

As Science Talk ’22 helped me see, these three aspects of effective science communication—audience, empathy, and messenger—are closely interrelated. Without understanding your audience, you cannot hope to be truly empathetic or pick the best messenger. The bottom line for me is that we should center our science communication on our audience’s needs and values rather than our own.

The conference gave me an abundance of ideas to ponder, resources to peruse, and friendships to cultivate. I found it invigorating and inspiring to see all of the great work that our community is involved in.
Picture
Workshop participants practice bringing empathy to science communication scenarios. Credit: Camille Collett
​Let us know in the comments what you have learned recently about scicomm, whether you picked it up at SciTalk ’22 or encountered it elsewhere in your scicomm journey. I hope to see you all at SciTalk ’23!
Picture
About the Author:
​Scott Hershberger (he/him) is an incoming master’s student in science communication at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, where he will focus on climate communication. He currently works to highlight the human side of mathematics as a writer at the American Mathematical Society. Before that, he wrote for Scientific American through the AAAS Mass Media Fellowship program and wrote about particle physics for Fermilab. 
Website: https://scott-hershberger.com/ 
Twitter: @scotthersh314

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Discussion
    Diversity Equity & Inclusion
    From The President's Desk
    Multimedia
    Personal Narratives
    Profiles
    SciComm
    SciComm Tips
    Science Design
    Science Talk News
    Speaking
    Thought Leadership
    Writing

    Pitch & Contribute

    Do you have something to say about science communication and looking for a good forum?

    ​Please see our pitching guide and then email blog@sciencetalk.org with your pitch and we'll discuss the details. 

    A Science Blog
    Co-editors

    Picture
    Christina M. Swords (she/her)
    @cmarvin67
    ​​
    Picture
    Amy R Nippert
    (she/her)
    @nipper_r

    Contact us at blog@sciencetalk.org

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017

Picture
​Science Talk is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit organization (Tax ID: 82-2076772). We are a volunteer-run organization and depend entirely on donors and sponsors for operational support. If you value science communication and would like to make sure decisions are made based on the value of science, please consider donating today.
© Copyright 2016. All Rights Reserved.
  • Conferences
    • SCIENCE TALK '23
    • SCIENCE TALK '22 >
      • Event Page '22
      • Agenda '22
      • Sponsors '22
      • Speakers '22
      • Logistics '22
    • SCIENCE TALK '21 >
      • Event Page '21
      • Agenda '21
      • Sponsors '21
      • Speakers '21
      • FAQ '21
    • SCIENCE TALK '20 >
      • Event Page '20
      • Agenda '20
      • Speakers '20
      • FAQ '20
      • Posters/Artwork '20
    • SCIENCE TALK '19 >
      • Schedule (2019)
      • Presentations (2019)
      • Panels (2019)
      • Workshops (2019)
      • Photos (2019)
    • SCIENCE TALK '18 >
      • Schedule (2018)
      • Keynotes (2018)
      • Photos (2018)
    • SCIENCE TALK '17 >
      • Schedule (2017)
      • Speakers (2017)
      • Photos (2017)
      • Videos (2017)
  • Community
    • Forum
    • "A Science Blog" >
      • Pitching Guide
      • Blog Contributor Style Guide
    • Volunteer Openings
    • Ethics Policy
  • Collaborate
    • Partnership Opportunities
    • Sponsors and Partners
    • Advisory Panel
  • Resources
    • Communication Resources
    • Training & Courses
    • Meet the Community
  • About
    • Membership
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Executive Board
    • Volunteers
    • Contact