Association of Science Communicators
  • Conferences
    • SCIENCE TALK '23
    • SCIENCE TALK '22 >
      • Event Page '22
      • Agenda '22
      • Sponsors '22
      • Speakers '22
      • Logistics '22
    • SCIENCE TALK '21 >
      • Event Page '21
      • Agenda '21
      • Sponsors '21
      • Speakers '21
      • FAQ '21
    • SCIENCE TALK '20 >
      • Event Page '20
      • Agenda '20
      • Speakers '20
      • FAQ '20
      • Posters/Artwork '20
    • SCIENCE TALK '19 >
      • Schedule (2019)
      • Presentations (2019)
      • Panels (2019)
      • Workshops (2019)
      • Photos (2019)
    • SCIENCE TALK '18 >
      • Schedule (2018)
      • Keynotes (2018)
      • Photos (2018)
    • SCIENCE TALK '17 >
      • Schedule (2017)
      • Speakers (2017)
      • Photos (2017)
      • Videos (2017)
  • Community
    • Forum
    • "A Science Blog" >
      • Pitching Guide
      • Blog Contributor Style Guide
    • Volunteer Openings
    • Ethics Policy
  • Collaborate
    • Partnership Opportunities
    • Sponsors and Partners
    • Advisory Panel
  • Resources
    • Communication Resources
    • Training & Courses
    • Meet the Community
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Executive Board
    • Volunteers
    • Contact
Picture

This section will not be visible in live published website. Below are your current settings (click inside this section to edit the settings):


Current Number Of Columns are = 3

Expand Posts Area = 1

Gap/Space Between Posts = 10px

Blog Post Style = card

Use of custom card colors instead of default colors =

Blog Post Card Background Color = current color

Blog Post Card Shadow Color = current color

Blog Post Card Border Color = current color

Publish the website and visit your blog page to see the results

Evangelizing the Cosmos: Science Documentaries and the Dangers of Wonder Overload

12/16/2021

1 Comment

 
By: David A. Kirby
​The end of December often brings a lot of dormant feelings to the forefront. Winter holidays, breaks from work and school, and the culmination of another year can bring peace, excitement, nervousness, and often…wonder. 
Have you ever felt, even subconsciously, wonder with science in popular media? Did you know it’s there for a reason? David Kirby takes us into this world, giving us a cautionary tale and advice. A shortened and updated version of his article is below. You can read his full piece on his blog.
The Pacific Ocean from space
Image: Flickr.com

​Evangelizing the Cosmos: Introduction

​Any fan of popular science would be excused if they felt as if they were currently experiencing “wonder overload.” The concept of “wonder” has become omnipresent across the science and entertainment landscape but it has particularly found a home in contemporary science documentaries. Wonder certainly played a central role as a framing device for the recent Cosmos re-boot presented by astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson. Indeed, we are told in the series that deGrasse Tyson’s “spaceship of the imagination” is “fueled by equal parts of science and wonder.” 
There are also many scenes in the new Cosmos where deGrasse Tyson reminds us that we need to be humble and stand in awe of nature. My former colleague at the University of Manchester, physicist Brian Cox, has hosted a series of highly rated science documentaries in the UK over the past five years that also focused on “wonder” with the not-so subtle titles of Wonders of the Solar System, Wonders of the Universe, and Wonders of Life. 
​Wonder has proven to be a useful means of attracting casual viewers to a science documentary, but such a deep association of science with wonder is problematic; not least ways because of the historic connection between notions of wonder and religious conceptions of nature.
​In my opinion the real wonder of science is that despite being a product of flawed human societies it has allowed us to understand and engage with our world in a meaningful way. I doubt, however, that our future science documentaries will take that as their narrative framework.

​Constructing Science as Active Wonder in Science Documentaries

​In essence, these recent science documentaries represent one of the ways that the scientific community is attempting to wrest away from the religious community the notion of wonder as a way to frame of our relationship to the natural world. But it is the polysemic quality of the word “wonder” that is important for these science documentaries. Wonder not only means to “marvel” but also to “ponder.” Unlike their portrayal of religion as “helpless wonder”, recent science documentaries portray science as an “active wonder” where at least some humans can do something with their awe of nature in addition to marveling at it. 
Neil deGrasse Tyson gazes at the wonders of the universe from the “spaceship of the imagination” in CosmosNeil deGrasse Tyson gazes at the wonders of the universe from the “spaceship of the imagination” in Cosmos
In Cosmos and other recent science documentaries we are certainly meant to marvel at the natural world, but we are also meant to be even more in awe of scientists’ ability to pose and answer questions about the physical laws governing this complexity. These documentaries try to conceptualize the late Carl Sagan’s belief that science does not destroy our sense of wonder but that our ability to understand the universe leaves us with “undiminished wonder.” For example, in the episode “Hiding in the Light” from the Cosmos re-boot we do not lose our awe at the notion of an infinite universe, instead we gain a new sense of wonder at our ability to “see all the way back to the birth of our universe.”

So, in Cosmos and other contemporary science documentaries audiences marvel at the CGI enhanced wonders of nature, but they are asked to stand even more in awe of the wonders of science and the heroic scientists who wield this tool. The danger with this “secular wonder,” though, is that wonder still has its spiritual connotations and these recent science documentaries are merely transferring the object of reverence from nature to science and scientists. The sense of “helpless wonder” that the documentaries consider an ineffectual approach to nature has been shifted on to the audience who can now only sit and marvel at the work of scientists. The deployment of wonder in this way is meant to foster an appreciation for science and the work of scientists, but the risk is that appreciation for science turns into the worship of scientists.

​Scientific Uncertainty and the Dangers of Wonder Overload

​An over reliance on wonder in science documentaries gives the false impression that scientists are never wrong and that uncertainty is not an integral part of the scientific process. The danger for the scientific community is that an overdose of wonder can lead to disillusionment when science inevitably proves to be fallible. Reverence, rather than appreciation, for science leads to situations like the one in Italy in 2012 where six scientists were put in jail because their scientific predictions turned out to be incorrect. The current pandemic has also begun to teach the public an important lesson about the inherent existence of uncertainty in the scientific process.
When we expect scientists to always have the right answer, right away we end up with situations like the public confusion about the efficacy of masks in slowing the spread of the novel coronavirus, which led to anger at scientists for changing their public statements about masks early in the pandemic. Reverence for science can also lead to a public that is hesitant to challenge scientists. Just like with religious figures, if the public is too in awe of those in authority then they do not feel comfortable challenging their pronouncements or actions. Uncritical trust in scientists can be an issue during crises like the COVID pandemic when the public often cannot tell when scientists are actually trustworthy or whether these “scientists” are taking advantage of the public’s reverence for scientists.

David A. Kirby
About the author: David A. Kirby (He/Him/His)
David A. Kirby was a practicing evolutionary geneticist before leaving bench science for science communication. He is Chair of the Department of Interdisciplinary Studies in Liberal Arts at Cal Poly University in San Luis Obispo. He is author of Lab Coats in Hollywood: Science, Scientists and Cinema. His current book project, Indecent Science: Religion, Science, and Movie Censorship, explores how movies served as a battleground over science’s role in influencing morality.  
Website: https://thescienceandentertainmentlab.com/ 
Twitter: @king_gwangi 

1 Comment
Pavan Rajupalem link
1/16/2022 05:00:52 am

Very Informative post. I have started my blog very recently. I want to educate people about space. I am passionate about writing too. Any comments are appreciated. Thank you in advance.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Discussion
    Diversity Equity & Inclusion
    From The President's Desk
    Multimedia
    Personal Narratives
    Profiles
    SciComm
    SciComm Tips
    Science Design
    Science Talk News
    Speaking
    Thought Leadership
    Writing

    Pitch & Contribute

    Do you have something to say about science communication and looking for a good forum?

    ​Please see our pitching guide and then email blog@sciencetalk.org with your pitch and we'll discuss the details. 

    A Science Blog
    Co-editors

    Picture
    Christina M. Swords (she/her)
    @cmarvin67
    ​​
    Picture
    Amy R Nippert
    (she/her)
    @nipper_r

    Contact us at blog@sciencetalk.org

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017

Picture
​The Association of Science Communicators is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit organization (Tax ID: 82-2076772). We are a volunteer-run organization and depend entirely on donors and sponsors for operational support. If you value science communication and would like to make sure decisions are made based on the value of science, please consider donating today.
© Copyright 2016. All Rights Reserved.
  • Conferences
    • SCIENCE TALK '23
    • SCIENCE TALK '22 >
      • Event Page '22
      • Agenda '22
      • Sponsors '22
      • Speakers '22
      • Logistics '22
    • SCIENCE TALK '21 >
      • Event Page '21
      • Agenda '21
      • Sponsors '21
      • Speakers '21
      • FAQ '21
    • SCIENCE TALK '20 >
      • Event Page '20
      • Agenda '20
      • Speakers '20
      • FAQ '20
      • Posters/Artwork '20
    • SCIENCE TALK '19 >
      • Schedule (2019)
      • Presentations (2019)
      • Panels (2019)
      • Workshops (2019)
      • Photos (2019)
    • SCIENCE TALK '18 >
      • Schedule (2018)
      • Keynotes (2018)
      • Photos (2018)
    • SCIENCE TALK '17 >
      • Schedule (2017)
      • Speakers (2017)
      • Photos (2017)
      • Videos (2017)
  • Community
    • Forum
    • "A Science Blog" >
      • Pitching Guide
      • Blog Contributor Style Guide
    • Volunteer Openings
    • Ethics Policy
  • Collaborate
    • Partnership Opportunities
    • Sponsors and Partners
    • Advisory Panel
  • Resources
    • Communication Resources
    • Training & Courses
    • Meet the Community
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Executive Board
    • Volunteers
    • Contact